Two Decades of Neo-Marxist Class Analysis and Health Inequalities: A Critical Reconstruction

By Carles Muntaner, Edwin Ng, Haejoo Chung, Seth J. Prins in Class conflict and public health

January 1, 2015


January 1, 2015


12:00 AM


Most population health researchers conceptualize social class as a set of attributes and material conditions of life of individuals. The empiricist tradition of ‘class as an individual attribute’ equates class to an ‘observation’, precluding the investigation of unobservable social mechanisms. Another consequence of this view of social class is that it cannot be conceptualized, measured, or intervened upon at the meso- or macro levels, being reduced to a personal attribute. Thus, population health disciplines marginalize rich traditions in Marxist theory whereby ‘class’ is understood as a ‘hidden’ social mechanism such as exploitation. Yet Neo-Marxist social class has been used over the last two decades in population health research as a way of understanding how health inequalities are produced. The Neo-Marxist approach views social class in terms of class relations that give persons control over productive assets and the labour power of others (property and managerial relations). We critically appraise the contribution of the Neo-Marxist approach during the last two decades and suggest realist amendments to understand class effects on the social determinants of health and health outcomes. We argue that when social class is viewed as a social causal mechanism it can inform social change to reduce health inequalities.

Posted on:
January 1, 2015
1 minute read, 200 words
Class conflict and public health
exploitation health inequalities mechanism Neo-Marxist social class
See Also:
Relational Social Class, Self-Rated Health, and Mortality in the United States
Mental Illness, Drinking, and the Social Division and Structure of Labor in the United States: 2003-2015
Depressed? Anxious? Blame the Gender Pay Gap • Fortune